The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Oberlin College seeks to provide a clear and comprehensive policy to safeguard the welfare, rights, and privacy of all persons who participate as human subjects of research conducted by Oberlin students, faculty and staff.
More generally, the IRB seeks to foster the core ethical principles of beneficence, justice, and respect of individuals' dignity and autonomy as defined in the Belmont Report and set forth in the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Code of Federal Regulations (The “Common Rule”) Title 45, part 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations (Revised January 15, 2009, effective July 14, 2009).
All colleges and universities are required by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to have IRBs in order to protect human subjects involved in research. Members of the committee come from a variety of disciplines, including at least one member whose primary concerns are nonscientific and one member who is not affiliated with the college. It is the responsibility of the IRB to ensure that investigators comply with the relevant federal regulations and ethical guidelines set forth by the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP).
For details of the responsibilities and rules governing the IRB and investigators refer to the Office for Human Research Subjects Protections (OHRP) .
Delay in Federal IRB Common Rule Change
Regarding Human Subjects research, the U.S. Federal Government has DELAYED until July 19, 2018, the implementation of changes to the Common Rule (Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects) scheduled to become effective January 19, 2018.
Refer to the announcement regarding this change:
HHS and 16 Other Federal Departments and Agencies Issue a Final Rule to Delay for an Additional 6 Months the General Compliance Date of Revisions to the Common Rule While Allowing the Use of Three Burden-Reducing Provisions during the Delay Period.