|
Institutional Racism in LGBTU
To the Editor:
This letter is being written with great humility to not only the queer community on campus, but also to all students of color with open regard for the wrong-doings of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered Union during and following this past weekend’s Queer Party. At said party, which was open to the entire queer community on campus, two radical, queer women of color were asked to leave the party. They were asked to leave by members of the LGBTU that support a straight, white, male officer who has been open about his anti-safe space, racist and misogynistic politics. By supporting this officer they were also supporting his views which are inherently in opposition to those of the LGBTU. For this we, concerned members of LGBTU, would like to apologize for both the events at the Queer Party and the e-mail conversation which followed.
We are angry and disappointed to report that most of the people involved in the events of that night and the conversation that followed have refused to be accountable for their behavior or even participate in this apology. However, the LGBTU is still accountable for allowing this to happen. No member of the queer community should have been asked to leave, and when two members of the community were asked to leave, every member of the community should have challenged that. Additionally, when the event was discussed via e-mail between hosts of the party and involved members of LGBTU, racist stereotypes and factual discrepancies were used to defend the behavior of the hosts of the party. In that e-mail discussion, an officer of the LGBTU felt entitled to suggest that this conflict somehow compromised the leadership role of these women in Zami. Although all but one of the people involved in that conversation have chosen not to apologize for it, we, as members of LGBTU would like to state publicly that we do not support or condone racist behavior in our community. The idea that LGBTU has any right to affect the autonomy of any other queer organization is unacceptable. Furthermore, the idea that any white member of LGBTU should have a say in the membership or leadership of Zami is racist.
The events of the past weekend and the ensuing e-mail discussion were racist. The LGBTU was not only complacent in the happenings of these events, but also supportive. This is an example of how the institutional racism of the LGBTU manifests and reproduces itself. The LGBTU, as a primarily white organization, has made claims to be open to all queer people, often relying on the existence of satellite groups such as Zami to prove its welcomeness, or claiming to have attempted to become more inclusive of queer people of color. Regardless of such claims, LGBTU still suffers from racism and there is no acceptable apology for that.
Oberlin is a strange place in that people claiming gay and lesbian identities are not as greatly stigmatized here as in the outside world. White gay and lesbians are not confronted with homophobia in the same constant manner as people of color are confronted with racism. The LGBTU reflects and reinforces this. The LGBTU has not addressed its own racism and there is no acceptable apology for that lack of action. We, as members of LGBTU would like to hold ourselves, the organization, and our fellow members accountable for our racism as a part of an ongoing process to transform LGBTU into an anti-racist organization.
–Myrl Beam
College first-year
LGBTU co-chair
–Jessie Carr
College first-year
LGBTU member
–Bacilio Mendez II
College first-year
LGBTU co-treasurer
|
|
Victim
Excoriates Administration
Dye
Responds to Sexual Assault
Goldsmith:
Review Misleading
Obie
Questioning Ties to College After Assault Ruling
Senate
Speaks on Assault Issues
Harvey’s
Mom Responds
Administration
Statement
OC
Must Safeguard Free Speech
Security
Letter a Fabrication and Violation of Trust
LGBTU
Co-Chair Apologizes
Con
Must Reach Out
Institutional
Racism in LGBTU
OC
Condones Hate
Radio
Host Recounts Experiences With Oberlin Youth
Criticism
of Oberlin Animal Testing was Uninformed
Animal
Testing Morally Justified
Campus Must Accept
Conflict Before Overcoming It
Lack of Support
for Campus Literature Disgraceful
Hypocrisy Rampant
at Oberlin
Energy Challenge a
Successful Endeavor
Comparative
American Studies Necessary Major at OC
Reading Period
Time Inadequate
Some Lessons on
Porches/ing
Students Do Affect
Oberlin’s Housing
A Nice Walk
Through Tappan
Assaulters’
Presence on Campus is Not Acceptable
OC Shows Disregard
for Safety
Comp. Science
Article Undermined Student Influence
|