Commentary
Issue Commentary Back Next

Commentary

Tsk, tsk, shame on your reporters, the Queen does not get wedgies!

To the Editor:

I am writing on behalf of the Almighty Queen Chita who is too busy negotiating future joint performances with Ru-you-know-who to pick up a pen.

The Queen is not pleased with the fact that she broke a 6-inch heel in an unflattering fit of fury upon reading last week's so-called "article" on the Ball. Tuesday, April 9, 1996 the Queen took 21 minutes, 33 seconds out of her ever-so-hectic, glamorous lifestyle to bestow your Arts writer Ms. Rusin with numerous gems and secrets about the Ball and the Queen's priceless beauty formula. After taking seemingly dubious notes during the conference Ms. Rusin, much to the Queen's astonishment, managed to write a pathetic, twinkie-breathed, Lee-press-on, phoney-to-the-core, pre-K, blue-light-special, half-baked, mis-informed piece of journalisitc poo.

To clarify:
(a).Ms. Yuli Hsu, college junior, co-created the Queen's fabulous frock.
(b).Mr. Peter Sciscioli did NOT pick the Queen's wedgies.
(c).The Queen does not get wedgies.
(d).The King and the Royal Court who were awarded at the Ball have star-studded lives too. Interview them!!

The Queen requests the Review's deepest, PUBLISHED apologies and the replacement of her 6-inch red patent leather pumps in the form of a certified bank check in the amount of $89.53 made out to Frederick's of Hollywood.

-John Wright (Senior Communications Magistrate To The Glamourous,
Wedgie-free Queen Chita, Reigning Queen of the Drag Ball)


[Editors' note: The Oberlin Review stands behind its reporting.]

Oberlin

Copyright © 1996, The Oberlin Review.
Volume 124, Number 21; April 19, 1996

Contact Review webmaster with suggestions or comments at ocreview@www.oberlin.edu.
Contact Review editorial staff at oreview@oberlin.edu.