To the Editors:

I write out of concern about the anonymous anti-Zionist epithets plastered around campus lately. It seems as though OBSAD (Oberlin Students for Anonymous Dialogue, or some variation), the promoters of these messages feel that vandalizing campus property with anti-Zionist rhetoric is an appropriate form of expression and dialogue. I beg to differ. This anti-Zionist propaganda (“Zionism is Racism,” “Zionism is Genocide,” and “Zionists are Nazis”), is an example of hate speech and should be viewed as such. OBSAD and others are grossly misusing the privilege of anonymity to promote intimidating and hateful messages, while masking their intentions under the lofty guise of free speech. The writers of these statements have embarked upon a campaign of harassment, targeting and silencing those students who care about Israel and who care about peace. Meaningful dialogue is vital, and mutual recognition is key, but these types of messages cannot bring about either — anonymously or otherwise.

—Daniel Neuman
College senior