Editorial
Oberlin should join African AIDS fight
While hundreds of thousands of Americans protested against a war in Iraq last
weekend expressing concern over possible civilian casualties, approximately 5,500 people died from
complications of AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa.
In fact, its likely that more civilians will die in Africa from AIDS in a single weekend
than will perish in the Desert Storm reprise. Forty percent of the population is infected; which
is 24.5 million of the worlds 34.3 million HIV positive men and women live in Africa.
AIDS has created 13.2 million orphans; 12.1 million of them live in the African subcontinent. By
2010, the UN speculates there will be 42 million children orphaned by the epidemic. It simply boggles
the mind.
In 1999, 10,000 Americans died of AIDS. In 2000, 2.4 million Africans were consumed by the disease.
The handful of students who are organizing a response to the devastating epidemic should be roundly
lauded. They are not part of a chic movement, and they have turned to confront a terrible specter.
The African AIDS crisis will be remembered by future generations as a genocide levied by Western
governments and pharmaceutical companies. We are quietly sentencing millions to death by turning
a blind eye; already, it is a near certainty that more will die forgotten in Africa than in any
previous holocaust in world history.
We should ask ourselves: if 25 million people were infected from AIDS in Europe, would we not float
a sort of AIDS Marshall plan? Surely, we would pay it more heed. It is simply abominable that we
continue to allow the residue of colonialism and the legacy of racism to poison our decision-making.
We are tacitly endorsing the silent suffocation of an entire continent.
We do not suggest that protesting against a war in Iraq is without virtue, but we do suggest that
Oberlin realize the limited scope of the Iraq question in terms of real numbers of people. A member
of the Oberlin global AIDS contingent once told an editor that he was simply amazed at the apathy
students showed towards his cause.
Truly, Oberlin should be at the vanguard of this issue. The College, and its students, faculty
and staff have long been the progressive voice of reason in United States. It is embarrassing that
we have let this issue languish. It is depressing that President Bush spends more time talking
about it than Oberlinians.
We laud Bush for finally coming to his senses and acknowledging the scope of the crisis, promising
to devote billions of dollars to the epidemic in his State of the Union Address.
In particular, we praise his decision to negate some of the patents of American pharmaceutical
leviathans and offer condoms and safer-sex education, rather than his former message of plain abstinence.
The billions of dollars the U.S. will commit, and the treatment programs it will enable, will save
millions of lives.
But this, of course, is not enough. It will help, but will not solve, a burgeoning problem. More
money, more time, and more concern is needed. The crisis in Africa deserves more front page space
than anything relating to Iraq.
Students, faculty and staff should contact their representatives in Congress, as well as the President,
to push for debt relief and the funding of additional treatment programs in these beleaguered countries.
They should encourage the United States to divert a larger share of its foreign aid to countries
where people are dying exponentially, rather that simply languishing it on countries in economic
hardship. A $26 billion offer to Turkey to launch U.S. troops into Iraq should be rejected as vulgar
and unacceptable.
If we are to protest war in Iraq, we should look to the bigger picture and condemn a diversion
of American resources to a less explosive, less immediate situation. The Iraqi people are suffering:
this is true. But they are not dying by the millions each year.
Editorials are the responsibility of the Review editorial boardthe Editors in Chief,
Managing Editor and Commentary Editorand do not necessarily reflect the view of the staff
of the Review.
|