Drag
King Show: Explicit Sexual Scene Causes Controversy
To
the Editors:
Fervently
ready and avidly excited for my first ever drag experience, my friend
and I made our way to The Cat Wednesday, November 20, for “Packing
Heat”, a drag king show. The audience’s enthusiasm was
promising and I was anticipating a fun, entertaining show. I was
impressed by the talent in the music video, which was outstanding,
and definitely the rise and climax of the show. Other acts were
disappointing.
What I found most unappealing was the act with the priest and the
altar boy. Two drag kings lip-sunk to George Michael’s “Father
Figure”, while acting out an attraction and eventually a sexual
experience between a priest and an altar boy. I found this disgusting,
inappropriate, and offensive.
The act was questionable from the beginning. The priest sings sensually,
yearningly, while the altar boy finds porn in the priest’s
book. The boy realizes the priest is attracted to him and the boy
ignores lust and holds up a sign stating, “It is an abomination.”
He drops his sign and proceeds to go under the priest’s robe
and give him a blow job. They rip off their robes and expose their
tight, leather clothing and sexual passion. After imitating desire,
lust, passion, oral sex, and anal sex, the act was over. My problem
was the portrayal of the Catholic religion. I do not appreciate
the implication that the Catholics trap priests and nuns into a
life of sex deprivation. Celibacy is a personal choice, not a forced
way of life. Priests are not supposed to act on sexual desires towards
men or women.
It’s not about it being an abomination to be homosexual, it’s
about it being against their vow to have any type of sex.
Granted,homosexuality, according to Leviticus, is an abomination.
Because the list in Leviticus contains other outrageous ideas of
sin (i.e. wearing clothes of mixed cloth), many Christians (including
Catholics) are moving away from the abomination suggestion. The
generalization that all Christians are anti-gay is unfair. There
are many faiths that welcome LGBTQ people and do not believe we
are sinning in any way. By suggesting that this priest and altar
boy rip off their clothes, have sex on the spot, and run from their
religion, we further widen the gap between Queer Culture and the
rest of the world. In order to be equal and accepted, we need to
be closing that gap. Rather than suggesting that we overcome religion,
we should search for common ground. I do not want to imply that
everyone should become a Christian, but if we want to be equal to
them, we have to think of them as equal to us.
As a Christian lesbian, I am ashamed that a group of people claiming
to be so open-minded quickly shut out concepts of good in religion.
I always hear about how liberal of a college Oberlin is. I think
“liberal” is too flattering. We at Oberlin like to be
leftwing. Only a left-wing school would support an environment where
certain religions and political affiliations are criticized, and
shunned, forcing terms such as “closet-Christian, and closet-Catholic”.
“Queer Culture” events, like this drag show, only pull
backwards at the LGBTQ rights movement. The priest act was a portrayal
of random gay pornography, and not beautiful gay love. I realize
that perhaps it wasn’t their intention to offend a religion,
but it’s not what’s intended, it’s how it comes
across. I hope the LGBTQ community can come together and come to
terms with our own prejudices and stereotypes. Then, maybe, we can
join together to fight for a cause and not with each other.
–Megan
Highfill
College first-year
|