Jennifer Waldron (OC ’91) has recently returned as a visiting
professor in the English department. Waldron graduated a comparative literature
major with three required languages. She got her PhD from Princeton University
this fall and next year plans to teach at the University of Pittsburgh.
What does it feel like to be back in Oberlin after some time? How has it
changed and how has it stayed the same?
It feels great to be back. I love
the courses I’m teaching. The students are very creative and have
strong personal interests, which makes it a lot more fun for me. I made my
friends at other colleges jealous when I told them that two Oberlin
students, Meghan Brooks and Charlie Gill, performed Desdemona’s death
scene from Verdi’s Otello as part of their final project for the
Shakespeare class I taught last term. Oberlin is very much the same in many
ways: politically active students, great music, lots of fashions and
piercings, but things have changed as well. One thing I noticed, which seemed to
be confirmed by last week’s “Off the Cuff” interview
with Professor James Millette, is that race is no longer as central an
issue on campus as it was when I was here. One of the most valuable things
I learned at Oberlin, mainly from fellow students, was how many privileges
I had taken for granted as a white person. It’s disappointing to see
that so many of the problems we were discussing when I was here 15 years ago
haven’t changed — for instance the need for more Black tenured
faculty.
What does it feel like to see life on campus from the other perspective, not
as a student but as a part of the faculty?
People ask me if it’s weird
to teach where I was a student, but I think because I graduated so long ago and
I’ve changed a lot, it’s less weird than if I’d gone straight
to graduate school and come back. I’ve been a teacher for a long time,
been married for 10 years, and have a three-year-old daughter, so my
preoccupations and my self-image are very different than they were 15 years ago.
Believe it or not, I was pretty intimidated by my professors, not because of
anything they did but because I wasn’t proactive enough about my own
education. I still felt like I was jumping through hoops to a certain
extent, trying to satisfy someone else’s requirements. That really changed
when I went to graduate school after being a teacher myself.
What do you think about Oberlin’s grad program in education? Do you
think it’s a good idea and do you think that what has been done in order
to launch the program is enough?
I definitely think it’s a good
idea to have a program where students can get teacher certification and/or do
student teaching during college, but I’m afraid I don’t know enough
about Oberlin’s program to comment on it. I did take the practicum in
teaching while I was here, and the tutoring experience I got was quite
useful later on.
Some things never change. When you went to Oberlin you had classes with
professor Ron DiCenzo, who is retiring this year. What are your memories of him
and what would you like to tell him and his students?
I loved his course on
modern Japanese history partly because we read a lot of Japanese literature. I
ended up teaching a high school course on Asian literature, in translation, and
I used some of the books we had read in DiCenzo’s course with my own
students. They loved Kobo Abe. So I would just reflect on how wonderful it is
that Professor DiCenzo has made Japanese history accessible and
enjoyable for so many generations of students. I would hardly
know anything about the subject if it hadn’t been for his course, and
I certainly wouldn’t have introduced my high school students to Japanese
literature.
A bit on the lighter side, what permanent changes did Oberlin leave on you?
For example, many students now are compelled to show they belong to the Oberlin
campus through various piercings, especially since the tattoo parlor opened
downtown. Did something like this happen to you as well?
I had my piercings
done in high school, but I guess the biggest thing I’ve realized being
back here is how much my personal choices about family and parenthood were
influenced by my time at Oberlin. One of the permanent changes you can
see is that my daughter has my name as her last name and my husband’s
name as her middle name. Oberlin made me think, “Well, I can keep my name
when I get married but what’s the next step? Why shouldn’t I give it
to my daughter?” Also my husband, Benoni Outerbridge, has been her
primary parent while I finished my PhD and got a job as a
professor. I’ve been lucky to have such a great partner, but in
general I don’t think women should be the only ones to have to balance
work and family. Our range of choices is a lot wider when male partners are
willing to spend time raising children, which I hope is happening more and more.