Procedures of the Honor System
The SHC shall act in all cases of alleged violation of the Honor Code as described in section (A); this function
is to be exercised with reference to the good of both the individual and the whole community, according to the
procedures described below.
The Student Honor Committee administers the Honor System and therefore its work is normally conducted
when the college is in session. Timelines spelled out in this document with respect to SHC functions (e.g., SHC
investigations and hearings) are subject to delays that may occur due to fall or spring recesses, winter shutdown,
winter term, and summer vacation (hereafter "recess periods"). While the SHC may read and respond to e-mail
and other correspondence during recess periods, ordinarily, it is not possible to provide for the investigation or
adjudication of cases during these periods. Individuals reporting suspected violations are encouraged to submit
the reports and supporting documentary information as close to the time of the incident as possible even if it is not
reasonable for the case to be investigated during a recess period. This will allow the information to be documented
contemporaneous with the alleged incident.
1. FILING A COMPLAINT
All members of the Oberlin College community are required to report potential violations of the Honor Code when they suspect one has occurred.
Students should report potential violations either to their professor or to the SHC. Professors are to report directly
to the SHC, although they may consult with the departmental chair or a member of the FHC prior to making a
report in order to verify or test the validity of their suspicion. In situations where a member of the community
feels that there may be retribution for reporting the potential violation, the individual may remain anonymous by
reporting through the professor. However, all community members are strongly encouraged to be witnesses at
cases they have reported through a professor.
- Students who have violated or who believe they have witnessed the violation of the Honor Code may report
the potential violation directly to any member of the SHC at any time. The student may do so by completing
and submitting the standard Honor System Complaint form via e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org or via campus
mail to Wilder Information Desk, Box 22. The form is available for download at www.oberlin.edu/stuorg/shc/.
- A faculty member, administrator, or staff member suspecting a violation of the code has occurred is
responsible for contacting the person or persons suspected of the violation in an effort to seek any clarifying
information. If, after that conversation, the faculty member believes that a potential violation has taken place,
then the faculty member is urged to ask the student or students to self-report to the SHC. Within two business
days of asking the student(s) to self-report, the faculty member must report the incident to the SHC regardless
of whether the person(s) suspected of the violation has (have) self-reported.
The Honor System Complaint form is available for download at www.oberlin.edu/stuorg/shc/. Submit
completed forms via e-mail to email@example.com or via campus mail to Wilder Information Desk, Box 22.
- Faculty Informal Resolution Option: The SHC extends the option for faculty to request consent from the
SHC to resolve an incident informally when the faculty member believes that the suspected violation is minor,
and if the alleged violator accepts responsibility for the violation. The SHC reserves the right to review each
request to determine whether it views the potential violation as a minor one and to verify that the student
being reported has no prior reports. The SHC has the sole discretion to determine whether an incident may be
resolved informally. (For more information about the process see section F.4. e., below.)
In this instance, faculty should also complete and submit the standard Honor System Complaint form via email to firstname.lastname@example.org
or via campus mail to Wilder Information Desk, Box 22. The form is available for
download at www.oberlin.edu/stuorg/shc/.
- A student or faculty member observing or having information pertaining to a faculty member not fulfilling
their obligations under the Honor System is responsible for reporting this to the Faculty Honor Committee
(FHC). Such reports will be reviewed by the Faculty Honor Committee and referred to the relevant dean for
To report a suspected violation of the Honor Code, or to ask questions about how the Honor System functions, contact:
Student Honor Committee:
Wilder Hall Suite 105
Student Union Box 22
Coordinator - Hillary Mullan
Cochairs - Jamilla Jamal, Matt Kendrick
Secretary - Hannah Gilfix
Treasurer - Nina Axiotaxis
Honor System Liaison: Kimberly Jackson Davidson,
Associate Dean of Students
2. INVESTIGATION OF COMPLAINTS
- The SHC reserves the right to gather all information pertinent to the case. In the process of gathering
information, privacy shall be maintained to the extent reasonably possible.
- When an alleged violation is brought to the SHC, the committee shall take necessary steps to inform the
respondent and inquire into all factors deemed pertinent to the case.
(1) Upon receipt of an alleged violation of the Honor Code, one or two members of SHC shall be appointed
case managers. However, In the event that a professor has requested an informal resolution (see section F.1 c. Filing A Complaint, above):
i. The committee will review the request. Approval requires a two-thirds majority vote of a quorum of the
appointed committee as defined in section E. Authority in the System: 4.c. and 4.d.
ii. If the request is granted, the professor will meet with the student and a member of the SHC to
discuss the incident and to determine an appropriate educational intervention.
iii. The faculty shall report to the SHC on the result of the educational intervention.
iv. When a faculty member reports that a student has not complied with the decision reached through
informal resolution, the SHC reserves the right to investigate the matter and hold a formal hearing
regarding the initial report.
- All documents deemed relevant to the case will be made available to the panel, respondent, and
complainant through the Office of the Dean of Students during the business week prior to the scheduled
hearing. All panel members must review these documents prior to the hearing.
3. THE HEARING
- The case managers of the honor panel shall schedule a time with the respondent (and the complainant if
necessary) in order for the panel to hear the case. The time constraints of the respondent and complainant
will be taken into consideration. One of the case managers will chair the hearing. While the respondent
and complainant are each permitted to have an individual advisor who is a member of the Oberlin College
community present at the hearing, the case managers are not obliged to schedule the hearing around the
availability of the advisor(s). If an advisor is absent the hearing will proceed.
- The respondent and complainant may offer the committee written statements of their positions. Such
statement must be submitted at least three business days before the scheduled hearing date.
- The respondent maintains the right to request the complainant be present during the hearing, though not
necessarily in the room at the same time as the respondent is present. The respondent must declare to
case managers the desire to have the complainant present at least five business days prior to the hearing.
Following that declaration the case managers will determine the feasibility of the request and accept or deny
- A hearing panel will be comprised of five members drawn from the SHC membership. Members of the
committee who have conflicting interests in a case should withdraw from the process when the case is first
brought to the attention of the committee. The respondent also maintains the right to object in writing to
proposed members of the Honor Committee serving on the respondent's hearing panel. The respondent must
provide an explanation for each objection. The written objection(s) must be submitted to the case manager(s)
within one (1) business day of the respondent's initial meeting with the case manager(s). Case managers
retain the discretion to decide whether to grant or deny the request.
Note: In the event of an emergency, or if a single member of a hearing panel is absent at the time of a
scheduled hearing, the chair of the panel may extend to the respondent the opportunity to have the case
heard with only four members present. Permission must also be obtained in writing prior to the hearing
- Committee members shall maintain privacy to the extent reasonably possible. Under no circumstances
shall any person with knowledge of the case (faculty, administrator, or student) reveal information that would
identify the complainant or the respondent. However, the SHC will customarily recommend, but cannot require
that the complainant reveal their identity to the respondent.
- The respondent is expected to appear at the scheduled hearing. However, in the case of the respondent's
absence, the hearing may proceed. In the case of a documented emergency, however, the hearing may
be rescheduled at the discretion of the case managers. In such cases, and where possible, the respondent
must notify the panel in advance. In addition, a failure by the respondent to appear at the hearing without
documented emergency may result in a failure to comply charge filed through the judicial system.
- All information upon which a decision may be based must be introduced at the formal hearing. The
committee is sometimes forced to review material that involves plagiarism or copying. The committee
recognizes that in some instances the material may be too technical or in other ways too difficult for the
committee to judge whether a violation of the Honor Code has occurred. The committee reserves the right to
bring in consultants or present written statements from consultants from the college community who might be
experts in the field or who have some training in determining the original author of a work.
- The committee reserves the right to call other witnesses that it feels will help in the process of gathering
information. The presence of a witness may take the form of a physical appearance or a written statement,
determined at the discretion of the case managers. Character witnesses are not permitted. The case
managers may permit witnesses to withhold their identity from the respondent for reasons the case managers
- All hearings will be audio recorded.
- The hearing shall ordinarily consist of, but is not limited to, the following:
(1) At the start of the hearing, the case managers shall introduce the case and all people present shall state
their names and other pertinent information.
(2) All documents previously made available to the respondent, complainant, and panel members are
brought before the entire group at this time.
(3) If a complainant is present, they will present their position in the case. The case managers will introduce
relevant information at their discretion.
(4) The respondent will present their position in the case, and the case managers will introduce relevant
information at their discretion.
(5) The panel will question the respondent, and then the complainant for further clarification as needed.
(6) The respondent and complainant may ask questions of each other through the case managers. (If both
are not present in the room together, questions may be presented for the panel to be asked when the other
party is present. If the complainant is exempt from the hearing and the respondent has some questions
prior to the hearing, then the respondent should contact the case managers with the questions at least
three days prior to the hearing.)
(7) Witnesses who have been approved by the case manager(s) are allowed to testify and to be questioned
by the panel. The complainant and the respondent may question the witnesses through the case
(8) The case managers will inquire whether the respondent understands the events of the hearing that has
just taken place and will allow the respondent a reasonable chance to voice any final questions, thoughts,
- The panel meets in an executive session within one business day of the hearing to render a decision.
- Ideally, panelists will arrive at a decision by consensus. A supermajority of four panelists is minimally
required to vote that the respondent is in violation of the Honor Code. After a finding of responsibility, a simple
majority vote is needed in order to approve sanctions.
- The standard of proof: a respondent shall be found responsible when the information available to the board
at the hearing leads the panel to believe that it is more likely than not that the alleged violation(s) occurred.
- The committee will be guided (though not bound) by recommended minimum sanctions in order to help
ensure equity among cases.
- If there is an informal resolution in the respondent's Honor System record, that resolution may be taken into
account during sanctioning. The SHC reserves the right to treat a new incident as a second violation when
determining sanctions. (For more information about the process see sections F.2.b.1 and F.2.c. Investigation
of Complaints, above.)
- From time to time students face charges in more than one college disciplinary system at the same time.
Because the honor and judicial systems maintain distinct records, the Dean of Students (or designee) is
authorized to seek information regarding findings and sanctions in current or prior cases that may require
administrative coordination among the systems so that each system's sanctions may be fully and effectively
5. NOTIFICATION OF DECISION AND SANCTIONS
- After a hearing panel reaches a decision, the decision and its explanation will be sent to the Faculty Honor
Committee for review; all involved parties will take precautions to protect student privacy in this process.
- If the Faculty Honor Committee requests clarification or reconsideration of the decision, this process will
normally occur within five business days of the request.
- Once the Faculty Honor Committee has approved the decision, the chair of the Faculty Honor Committee
will inform the relevant dean in writing. This notice will ordinarily be copied to the SHC. The SHC will then
provide the relevant dean with the respondent's and complainant's names and other necessary information
The relevant dean will send a letter notifying the respondent of the decision. The letter will be copied to the
complainant (if permitted by applicable law), the SHC, and the Honor System Liaison.
- If the relevant dean does not agree with the recommendation of the SHC as approved by the Faculty Honor
Committee, or if the Faculty Honor Committee and SHC are unable to reach an agreement, then the relevant
dean will have authority to determine a finding or sanction. However, in such cases the relevant dean must
meet with the Faculty Honor Committee and the SHC to hear their views before making any ruling. Every
reasonable effort must be made to reach an agreement among the SHC, the Faculty Honor Committee, and
the relevant dean. When the sanctions for an offense include suspension or dismissal, the relevant dean
may only deviate from the recommendations of the SHC or the Faculty Honor Committee if the relevant
dean determines the proposed sanctions to be grossly disproportionate to the offense. If the relevant dean
exercises the authority to impose a sanction, then any appeal is to be handled by the relevant dean of the
- This process of approval and notification will customarily occur in a time frame such that the respondent will
be notified of the decision within 15 business days after the hearing.
Exceptions: Decision letters generated as a result of hearings held during the last two to three weeks of the
fall semester may be mailed to OCMR boxes during the first two to three weeks of the spring semester if the
respondent is enrolled for the spring semester. If the respondent is not enrolled during the spring semester
for any reason, the letter may be mailed to the last permanent address on file with the registrar, or to an
alternate address that the respondent provides to the SHC at or before the hearing. Decision letters generated
as a result of hearings held during the last two to three weeks of the spring semester will be mailed to the
last permanent address on file with the registrar, or to an alternate address that the respondent provides
to the SHC at or before the hearing. (According to section V. Social Conduct and Regulations; Y. Mailroom
Regulations, students are expected to pick up mail daily.)
- Failure to retrieve one's mail is not an excuse for not completing a sanction. Individuals who do not complete
sanctions for this reason may face a Failure to Comply charge with the judicial system.
- The respondent and complainant may contact the case managers for any available explanation of the
- All letters, regardless of the decision, shall be kept for the case files of the SHC.
6. SANCTIONS FOR HONOR CODE VIOLATIONS
- In the case of a violation of the Honor Code, a notation of honor probation shall be made on the violator's
internal record. Sanctions that may be considered by the SHC include, but are not limited to:
(1) A formal reprimand and warning.
(2) Reflective paper or revision of the work in question.
(3) Educational service.
(4) The loss, limitation, or restriction of certain nonessential rights in the college, such as participation in
extracurricular activities or representing the college off campus.
(5) A recommendation that the instructor issue a failing grade, or no grade at all, for the assignment.
Ultimately, the instructor maintains the right to assign a failing grade for the assignment or the course.
(6) Withholding the diploma of a graduating senior until the completion of the sanctions.
(7) Prohibiting participation by a graduating senior in the commencement ceremony.
(8) Suspension. The rights and privileges of being a student at Oberlin College may be suspended for a
specific period of time, the minimum of which will be to the end of the current semester. The student must
leave the campus and may return at the end of the period of suspension without petitioning for readmission.
However, the returning student must go through a reinstatement process that is initiated through the Office
of the Registrar. The following will normally accompany this sanction of suspension:
i.) Parental Notification.
ii.) Restriction from college property for the duration of suspension. The Office of Safety and Security
will ordinarily enforce this restriction by issuing a no trespass letter to the suspended individual and by
adding the individual's name to the trespass list it maintains.
iii.) Students who are suspended are expected to vacate their college residence within two business
days of notification being delivered to the campus mailroom by the SHC. It is the student's responsibility
to consult with the Department of Residential Education to clarify any questions about its guidelines for
properly vacating a housing unit.
The sanction of suspension will be a part of a student's permanent disciplinary record, and part
of the student's academic record and transcript for the term of suspension. In the event a student
withdraws from the college prior to the end of the term of suspension, the penalty will remain on both the
permanent academic and disciplinary records.
Normally, suspended students may not earn credits toward their Oberlin degree until after they
have been reinstated at Oberlin College... Under special circumstances, a suspended student may
be permitted to transfer a maximum of six credits for academic work done at another school -
during the period of suspension - toward their Oberlin degree. However, the student must receive
permission in advance of taking coursework at another school, and must make arrangements for
the transfer of credit prior to enrolling in the courses to be transferred. Students seeking transfer
credit must apply in writing to the Dean of Studies providing the following information: title and
description of each course; number of credit hours; name and location of institution; an explanation
of how each course fits into the student's Oberlin program; why it is more appropriate to the
course(s) while suspended than upon return to Oberlin.
For more detailed information consult with staff in the Office of the Dean of Studies, Peters Hall 205,
(9) Dismissal: The permanent termination of student and degree-candidate status at Oberlin College.
This sanction may be imposed only in the most serious of cases, or when a student has been suspended
previously and commits another offense determined to constitute grounds for imposition of a second
suspension. This sanction will permanently remain on a student's academic record.
- The above sanctions may be assigned individually or in combination at the discretion of the SHC.
- In the case of a first offense the administrative notation of honor probation may not appear on the violator's
official transcript, held in the Office of the Registrar, but will be released with other academic or disciplinary
information upon the violator's written request, but only when the SHC notes in its decision letter that the
findings and sanctions are meant for "external report."
- Failure to comply with the sanctions imposed by the committee shall result in a failure to comply complaint
filed with the Oberlin College Judicial System. In the event that such a complaint is filed, the content of the
case file including correspondence between committee members and the respondent may be offered to the
Judicial Coordinator as documentary information.
- In the case of a second violation, the committee is urged to adopt a sanction of suspension, or dismissal. In
the case of a graduating senior, suspension may be substituted by refusing to allow the violator to participate
in commencement exercises or delaying by a semester or more the awarding of an Oberlin degree.
- If a degree is withheld or a student is suspended or dismissed as a result of being found responsible for
an Honor Code violation, the sanction will be retained as part of the permanent Honor System record held in
the Office of the Dean of Students. In addition, the sanctions shall be recorded on the respondent's official
transcript and reflect that the sanction is the result of an Honor Code violation for the term of the sanction.
After the term of the sanction has been fulfilled, normally the notation will be removed from the transcript;
however, all suspensions will remain a part of the individual's permanent Honor System record. As noted
in 6.a. above, if a student who has been suspended withdraws from Oberlin College before the term of
suspension ends, then the notation of suspension shall remain on the individual's transcript permanently. The
Office of the Dean of Students shall release this information with other academic or disciplinary information
upon the violator's written request.
- If, in response to a second offense, the Student Honor Committee imposes sanctions other than those
urged in section 6.a., the sanctions will only be recorded on the individual's Honor System record. Such
sanctions shall be released with other academic or disciplinary information upon the individual's written
request for up to seven years following the notification of the findings of the original hearing panel.
- Appeals may be granted for four reasons:
(1) A mishandling of the case from a procedural standpoint.
(2) A sanction grossly disproportionate to the violation(s).
(3) New information not reasonably available at the time of the hearing.
(4) A decision made in the absence of a respondent who missed the original hearing because of a
documented emergency that could not reasonably be reported prior to the scheduled hearing.
- Only respondents have the right to appeal.
- The respondent may appeal in writing to the Dean of the College or of the Conservatory within 10 business
days after the student has been notified of the decision via registered campus mail (or registered U.S. mail
during a recess period and the letter is mailed to an off-campus address.) The letter to the dean from the
respondent must indicate which of the four reasons above is pertinent and give a clear rationale explaining
why the appeal should be granted. The letter must be submitted under the cover of the appeal request form
mailed to the respondent with the final decision letter.
Note: The date that the letter is delivered to the campus mailroom will begin the 10 business-day appeal
period. It is the responsibility of the respondent per college policy to check the personal OCMR box on a
regular basis during times when classes are in session (see section V. Social Conduct and Regulations, Y.
Mailroom Regulations.) The respondent is responsible for presenting the claim slip to mailroom staff in order to
obtain the decision letter. Failure to claim a decision letter may result in a failure to comply complaint filed with
the judicial system. When school is not in session the default address is the most recent permanent address
on file with the Registrar, unless the respondent provides the case manager(s) a preferred mailing address at
or before the hearing. Respondents are required to complete and submit their appeal within 10 business days.
Recess periods do not stay the appeal submission deadline.
- Upon receiving an appeal letter the relevant dean has the authority to uphold, reduce or increase the
sanctions imposed. Prior to rendering a decision in response to an appeal the relevant dean (or the relevant
dean's designee) will review the case file and investigate to determine whether the appeal is substantive.
The relevant dean shall give deference to the recommendations made by the Student Honor Committee
and approved by the Faculty Honor Committee when responding to appeals. Deviations from prescribed
procedures will not necessarily invalidate a decision or proceeding, unless the relevant dean determines
that significant prejudice to the respondent may result from a decision to uphold the recommendation of the
Student Honor Committee as approved by the Faculty Honor Committee. When the sanctions for an offense
include suspension or dismissal, the sanctions may only be reduced when the relevant dean (following
consultation with representatives of the hearing panel and the Faculty Honor Committee who recommended
the original decision) determines the sanctions to be grossly disproportionate to the offense.
- The relevant dean is urged to communicate the appeal decision to the respondent, complainant, and the
SHC within 10 business days, together with a brief rationale. Recess periods generally should not delay the
- In the event that the relevant dean upholds the recommendation of the Student Honor Committee, an
ultimate appeal may be made to the president of the college (or the president's designee) in writing within 10
business days of the relevant dean's decision. Recess periods do not stay the appeal submission deadline.
The president's decision (or that of the president's designee) is final.
It is the policy of the college not to release copies of disciplinary records, Honor System records and
proceedings, judicial case files, or investigative files to students or to third parties, unless required by law.
Records are available for the student's inspection in the Office of the Dean of Students upon submission of a
signed written authorization form. (For more information regarding access to Honor System records please see
the full college records policy; Student Records section, AA. 5. a. and b.)
- The full official record of the case including the respondent's name shall be kept on file in the Office
of the Dean of Students. These files will be accessible to the Student Honor Committee, the Dean of
Students, the Honor System Liaison, and the divisional deans and their designees only as is consistent with
applicable law and the college's policy on student records or other applicable college regulations pertaining
to student privacy. The divisional deans, the Dean of Students and the Honor System Liaison to support
the administrative efforts of these officers may maintain an abridged working record of cases containing the
respondent's name and case number.
- Honor System records will be maintained separately from the records of other college disciplinary systems
such as the judicial system. However, as noted section F. Procedures of the Honor System, 4.f of this charter,
the Dean of Students (or designee) is authorized to review information regarding findings and sanctions in
current or prior cases that may require administrative coordination among the systems so that each system's
sanctions may be fully and effectively enforced.
- When the SHC is satisfied that the sanctions for a first offense have been fulfilled, the notation of probation
shall remain on the violator's Honor System record held in the Office of the Dean of Students. It shall be noted
that the action was taken as a result of a first violation of the Honor Code. When the decision letter for a case
contains the designation "for external report," the file will be maintained permanently. If the letter does not
indicate that the decision is for external report, then the file along with any audio recordings associated with it
will be destroyed seven years following the notification of the findings of the original hearing panel in accord
with section 8.b. above.
- When a respondent has a diploma withheld, the sanction is noted on the transcript during the time of the
sanction. It shall be noted on the respondent's transcript that the "diploma or degree is being withheld pending
a disciplinary process." The honor system file will be maintained permanently.
- If the notation of a penalty is to be retained permanently on the student's Honor System record in the Office
of the Dean of Students (as provided under section d. above), the record of the case likewise shall be kept
permanently. Otherwise this record (including any associated audio recordings) shall be destroyed seven
years following the notification of the findings of the original hearing panel.
- When a respondent is suspended, the respondent's transcript shall normally reflect a notation of "Honor
Code suspension" during the term of suspension, until the respondent is eligible to be reinstated. See section
F. 6. a. (8) for more detail. Notations of dismissal that result from Honor System proceedings will remain on
the transcript permanently, and the Honor System file will be maintained permanently.
- The Student Honor Committee Coordinator shall maintain, update annually, and provide to the Honor
System Liaison in the Office of the Dean of Students a database including at least the names of respondents,
charges, committee findings, and sanctions imposed. The database will be used to help the Dean of Students
(or the dean's designee) to complete dean certification forms and letters in response to a written request of a