In the field of opera, the towering figure of Rameau, with his tremendous output during these decades, tended to dwarf his contemporaries, Royer included, and to overshadow their operatic achievements. It is inconceivable that the two would not have had substantial contact, working as they did in the same professional circles. We have evidence of one meeting between Rameau and Royer in a 1742 police report of a fight between them “en plein café”. If we are to believe Labbet’s description of Royer as a man “d’un caractère aimable et de la plus grande politesse”, we may surmise that Rameau provoked the incident.
Royer’s reputation as an opera composer was largely based on the tremendous success of one opera-ballet, Zaïde, which was frequently revived after its première in 1739, remaining in the repertoire until the 1770’s. Other operatic works included Pirrhus (tragédie lyrique), performed in Paris in 1730, Le Pouvoir de l’Amour (opéra-ballet) in 1743, Almasis (opéra-ballet) in 1750.
During
the 1740’s, theatrical productions were often given at
The
portrait that emerges is that of an excellent and well-respected musician and
composer, a competent and influential administrator, a central establishment
figure. Royer performed his job
conscientiously; he was successful and esteemed. Not surprisingly, Royer was among the elect
group whom Titon du Tillet elevated to
Excerpt from the preface to Joseph-Nicolas-Pancrace Royer, Pièces de clavecin, ed. Lisa Goode Crawford, Le Pupitre 71 (Paris: Heugel & Cie., 1990; distributed by Éditions Alphonse Leduc & Cie.)
![]() |
![]() |