Theories
Behind the School to Work Transition
Ernesto Betancourt
The transition into becoming an active part of the workforce is a complicated
one. There are many social, physical, and environmental contexts
that come into play during this transition.
It is believed that
successful work transition depends on how well students
navigate many previously learned career tasks (Lent, Hackett, Brown, 1999)
such as:
-
interest crystallization
-
cultivation of decisional
skills
-
career exploration
These tasks are introduced in the elementary years and continue developing
throughout schooling and usually continue through the students’ entry into
the workplace. The transition into the workforce is one that requires
a long preparatory period and is followed by a long period of adjustment
to social roles (Lent et al, 1999).
Six
basic career orientations that characterize the school to work transition
(Savickas, 1999):
-
the ambitious, who are
advancing in income or status
-
the responsive, who have
taken jobs provided or chosen by their parents
-
the fulfilled, who have
a permanent job they like
-
the confused, who move
erratically from job to job
-
the frustrated, who are
blocked from moving to a better job
-
defeated, who repeatedly
move downward to jobs with lower income and status.
These different orientations widely vary between individuals. The
career path chosen usually comes from individual levels of motivation and
desire to achieve, which are primarily formed from social constructs and
by examples set by role models.
In an attempt to further understand the transition from school to the workplace,
social cognitive theories can be applied.
Three social cognitive theories
whose interactions have a large effect on this transition are (Lent et
al, 1999):
-
self-efficacy
-
outcome expectations
-
goals
Different combinations of situations within these theories lead to different
levels of successful transition. Students who successfully make the
transition into the workforce usually have high expectations for themselves,
believe that they will be successful, and have set high goals to achieve.
There is a certain amount of cognitive readiness that is required for a
person the make the transition from school to the workforce. There
are six main types of vocational movement (Savickas, 1999). The
first three types are:
-
training,
-
experimenting
-
stabilizing
These are the positive aspects of vocational movement. If these can
be worked on in the middle years of high school students not entering college
will be more prepared to enter the work force. Working on these areas
will also ensure that the student is more definite about their career choice.
The
more negative aspects of vocational movement are:
-
drifting
-
floundering
-
stagnating
These are very detrimental in deciding on and obtaining a career path.
High school students that display these are not likely to be very successful
in the workforce and are more likely to get lost in the “real world.”
These aspects of vocational movement should be highly discouraged in high
school and steps should even be taken to prevent them. The more successful
in choosing and obtaining a career path will have a good understanding
and integration of these three cognitive concepts.
References:
1. Lent, R.W.,
Hackett, G., Brown, S.D. (1999). A social cognitive view of school-to-work
transition. The Career Development Quarterly, 47(4), 297-311.
2. Savickas, M.L.
(1999). The Transition From School to Work: A Development Perspective.
The Career Development Quarterly, 47(4), 326-336.
Other
Related Sources:
1. Crites, J.
O. (1978). Theory and Research Handbook for the Career Maturity Inventory
(2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill. Testing for Career Adjustment
and Development. Training and Development Journal, 36, 21-26.
2. Dornbusch, S.M. (2000).
Transitions from adolescence: A Discussion of Seven Articles,15(1), 173-177.
3. Vondracek, F.W.,
Silbereisen, R.K., Reitzle, M., Weiser, M. (1999). Vocational Preferences
of Early Adolescents: Their Develpoment in Social Context. Journal of Adolescent
Research, 14(3), 267-288.
Back to
homepage
Interview
|