|
Spring 2002 |
|
|
English 356 |
Rice 28, (440) 775-8918 |
We will read a group of texts that market themselves as oppositional or minority literature. By reading a selection of working class, feminist, queer, gaelic, and postcolonial novels, we will try to examine the ways in which contemporary fiction both relies upon and challenges its marginal status. We will examine the kinds of rhetorical positions and narrative strategies shared by this very diverse group of writers in order to think about “minorityness” as a trend in and function of postwar British cultural production. All of these novels inscribe difference and interrogate systems of exclusion, and we will think about whether or not that creates a coherent discursive space for the articulation of a minority politics. Furthermore, we will think about the stakes and implications of such a position: does marking oneself as an outsider announce an oppositional politics? Finally, what happens when minority literature becomes canonized—does its privileged status jeopardize its ability to explore systems of exclusion?
Texts
Banville, John. The Untouchable. (370 pp.)Fitzgerald, Penelope. Offshore. (140 pp.)Ishiguro, Kazuo. The Remains of the Day. (250 pp.)Kelman, James. How Late it Was, How Late. (370 pp.)Rhys, Jean. Wide Sargasso Sea. (190 pp.)Rushdie, Salman. The Satanic Verses. (550 pp.)Salih, Tayeb. A Season of Migration to the North. (170 pp.)Selvon, Samuel. Lonely Londoners. (140 pp.)Sillitoe, Alan. Saturday Night and Sunday Morning. (230 pp.)Coursepack.
Course Objectives
This course has two primary goals: 1—to study the dominant themes and techniques of contemporary British fiction; 2—to develop students’ research skills and familiarize them with some of the important theorists in the field. I also hope students will build upon the close reading skills they already possess. With this in mind, I would like this to become a text-centered course: I expect us to base our class discussions on textual exegesis, and I hope that students will learn to speak, argue, and ultimately analyze by using textual evidence. Students should bring their texts to class every day, and I hope to see them dog-eared and annotated extensively. I want this to be a discussion-based course, which requires a significant contribution from each student. This will work well only if students come prepared to class; I would like each of you to mark important passages in the reading and think about their significance. In order to practice these skills, student will do group project work on particular theoretical problems relevant to this field.
Assignments
Policies
Absences: students may miss three classes (unexcused) during the term. Religious holidays (please give advance notice) and illness (with doctor’s note) count as excused absences; students will not be penalized under such circumstances. Each subsequent absence will result in a substantial penalty (1/3 of a letter grade) against final course grades (ie., overall grade of B would be lowered to a B-). This penalty is very severe and is not negotiable: please do not force me to invoke it.
Grading: I will use a numerical system for grading. There are two hundred (200) points for the semester. In essence, letter grades will be calculated with a declining ten percent (10%) scale: over 90% will translate to a grade in the “A” range, between 80-89% in the “B” range, and so forth. Here is the exact formula: 183 total points or more: A; 180-182: A-; 176-179: B+; 164-175: B; 160-163: B-; 156-159: C+; 144-155: C; 140-143: C-; fewer than 140: No credit. Here is a breakdown of individual assignments:
Each short paper is worth ten (10) points; cumulatively, they are worth seventy (70) points or thirty-five percent (35%) of the final grade.
The final paper is worth fifty (50) points or twenty-five percent (25%) of the final grade.
The group project is worth twenty (20) points or ten percent (10%) of the final grade.
Class participation is worth sixty (60) points or thirty percent (30%) of the final grade. Be advised that participation carries much weight in this class. I will give real grades for this. Be advised that I look for thoughtful contributions to the class rather than frequent but insubstantial comments.
Office hours: I will hold office hours twice a week (Wed. & Fri. 1-2PM). I realize that this may not be convenient for everyone so I am also available by appointment. My office is located at 28 Rice Hall. You will have to meet me in office hours at least once at the beginning of the semester to discuss your interest in the course and once to discuss your paper proposal; after that, the opportunity (or onus) is yours. I strongly urge you to take advantage of my office hours; don’t come only when you have serious problems.
Syllabus
|
Date |
Class |
Assignments |
|
Feb 4 |
Introduction |
|
|
Feb 6 |
Saturday Night and Sunday Morning |
|
|
Feb 8 |
Saturday Night and Sunday Morning |
|
|
Feb 11 |
Saturday Night and Sunday Morning |
Short paper #1 |
|
Feb 13 |
Saturday Night and Sunday Morning; Klaus |
|
|
Feb 15 |
Saturday Night and Sunday Morning; Klaus |
|
|
Feb 18 |
Lonely Londoners |
Short paper #2 |
|
Feb 20 |
Lonely Londoners; Lamming | |
|
Feb 22 |
Lonely Londoners; Lamming | |
|
Feb 25 |
The Untouchable |
Short paper #3 |
|
Feb 27 |
The Untouchable | |
|
Mar 1 |
The Untouchable | |
|
Mar 4 |
The Untouchable; Sinfield and McKibbin |
Group project presentation on queer theory |
|
Mar 6 |
The Untouchable; Sinfield and McKibbin | |
|
Mar 8 |
The Untouchable; Sinfield and McKibbin | |
|
Mar 11 |
Season of Migration to the North |
Short paper #4 |
|
Mar 13 |
Season of Migration to the North; Said |
Group project presentation on postcolonial theory |
|
Mar 15 |
Season of Migration to the North; Said | |
|
Mar 18 |
Wide Sargasso Sea |
Short paper #5 |
|
Mar 20 |
Wide Sargasso Sea; Spivak |
Group project presentation on feminism |
|
Mar 22 |
Wide Sargasso Sea; Spivak |
|
Mar 25 |
No class (Spring break) | |
|
Mar 27 |
No class (Spring break) | |
|
Mar 29 |
No class (Spring break) | |
|
Apr 1 |
How Late it Was, How Late |
Short paper #6 |
|
Apr 3 |
How Late it Was, How Late | |
|
Apr 5 |
How Late it Was, How Late | |
|
Apr 8 |
How Late it Was, How Late; Booker Prize readings | |
|
Apr 10 |
How Late it Was, How Late; Booker Prize readings |
Group project presentation on the Booker Prize |
|
Apr 12 |
How Late it Was, How Late; Booker Prize readings |
Final paper proposal due |
|
Apr 15 |
Offshore |
Short paper #7 |
|
Apr 17 |
Offshore | |
|
Apr 19 |
Offshore | |
|
Apr 22 |
Remains of the Day |
Short paper #8 |
|
Apr 24 |
Remains of the Day | Final paper due (first draft) |
|
Apr 26 |
Remains of the Day | |
|
Apr 29 |
The Satanic Verses |
Short paper #9 |
|
May 1 |
The Satanic Verses | |
|
May 3 |
The Satanic Verses |
Group project presentation on the “Rushdie Affair” |
|
May 6 |
The Satanic Verses; Bhabha | |
|
May 8 |
The Satanic Verses; Bhabha | |
|
May 10 |
The Satanic Verses; Bhabha | |
|
? |
Final papers due |
Final papers due |
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY