Spring 2002

Peter Kalliney

English 356
MWF 2:30-3:20, King 323    

Rice 28, (440) 775-8918
Office hours: Wednesday & Friday, 1:00-2:00,
E-mail: Peter.Kalliney@oberlin.edu

Contemporary British Fiction and Minority Discourse

We will read a group of texts that market themselves as oppositional or minority literature.  By reading a selection of working class, feminist, queer, gaelic, and postcolonial novels, we will try to examine the ways in which contemporary fiction both relies upon and challenges its marginal status.  We will examine the kinds of rhetorical positions and narrative strategies shared by this very diverse group of writers in order to think about “minorityness” as a trend in and function of postwar British cultural production.  All of these novels inscribe difference and interrogate systems of exclusion, and we will think about whether or not that creates a coherent discursive space for the articulation of a minority politics.  Furthermore, we will think about the stakes and implications of such a position: does marking oneself as an outsider announce an oppositional politics?  Finally, what happens when minority literature becomes canonized—does its privileged status jeopardize its ability to explore systems of exclusion?

Texts

Banville, John.  The Untouchable. (370 pp.) 
Fitzgerald, Penelope.  Offshore. (140 pp.)
Ishiguro, Kazuo.  The Remains of the Day. (250 pp.)
Kelman, James.  How Late it Was, How Late. (370 pp.)
Rhys, Jean.  Wide Sargasso Sea. (190 pp.)
Rushdie, Salman.  The Satanic Verses. (550 pp.)
Salih, Tayeb.  A Season of Migration to the North. (170 pp.)
Selvon, Samuel.  Lonely Londoners. (140 pp.)
Sillitoe, Alan.  Saturday Night and Sunday Morning. (230 pp.)
Coursepack.

Course Objectives

This course has two primary goals: 1—to study the dominant themes and techniques of contemporary British fiction; 2—to develop students’ research skills and familiarize them with some of the important theorists in the field.  I also hope students will build upon the close reading skills they already possess.  With this in mind, I would like this to become a text-centered course: I expect us to base our class discussions on textual exegesis, and I hope that students will learn to speak, argue, and ultimately analyze by using textual evidence.  Students should bring their texts to class every day, and I hope to see them dog-eared and annotated extensively.  I want this to be a discussion-based course, which requires a significant contribution from each student.  This will work well only if students come prepared to class; I would like each of you to mark important passages in the reading and think about their significance.  In order to practice these skills, student will do group project work on particular theoretical problems relevant to this field.

Assignments

Policies

Absences: students may miss three classes (unexcused) during the term.  Religious holidays (please give advance notice) and illness (with doctor’s note) count as excused absences; students will not be penalized under such circumstances.  Each subsequent absence will result in a substantial penalty (1/3 of a letter grade) against final course grades (ie., overall grade of B would be lowered to a B-).  This penalty is very severe and is not negotiable: please do not force me to invoke it.

Grading: I will use a numerical system for grading.  There are two hundred (200) points for the semester.  In essence, letter grades will be calculated with a declining ten percent (10%) scale: over 90% will translate to a grade in the “A” range, between 80-89% in the “B” range, and so forth.  Here is the exact formula: 183 total points or more: A; 180-182: A-; 176-179: B+; 164-175: B; 160-163: B-; 156-159: C+; 144-155: C; 140-143: C-; fewer than 140: No credit.  Here is a breakdown of individual assignments:

Each short paper is worth ten (10) points; cumulatively, they are worth seventy (70) points or thirty-five percent (35%) of the final grade.

The final paper is worth fifty (50) points or twenty-five percent (25%) of the final grade.

The group project is worth twenty (20) points or ten percent (10%) of the final grade.

Class participation is worth sixty (60) points or thirty percent (30%) of the final grade.  Be advised that participation carries much weight in this class.  I will give real grades for this.  Be advised that I look for thoughtful contributions to the class rather than frequent but insubstantial comments.

Office hours: I will hold office hours twice a week (Wed. & Fri. 1-2PM).  I realize that this may not be convenient for everyone so I am also available by appointment.  My office is located at 28 Rice Hall.  You will have to meet me in office hours at least once at the beginning of the semester to discuss your interest in the course and once to discuss your paper proposal; after that, the opportunity (or onus) is yours.  I strongly urge you to take advantage of my office hours; don’t come only when you have serious problems.

Syllabus

Date

Class

Assignments

Feb 4

Introduction

Feb 6

Saturday Night and Sunday Morning

Feb 8

Saturday Night and Sunday Morning

Feb 11

Saturday Night and Sunday Morning

Short paper #1

Feb 13

Saturday Night and Sunday Morning; Klaus

Feb 15

Saturday Night and Sunday Morning; Klaus

Feb 18

Lonely Londoners

Short paper #2

Feb 20

Lonely Londoners; Lamming

Feb 22

Lonely Londoners; Lamming

Feb 25

The Untouchable

Short paper #3

Feb 27

The Untouchable

Mar 1

The Untouchable

Mar 4

The Untouchable; Sinfield and McKibbin

Group project presentation on queer theory

Mar 6

The Untouchable; Sinfield and McKibbin

Mar 8

The Untouchable; Sinfield and McKibbin

Mar 11

Season of Migration to the North

Short paper #4

Mar 13

Season of Migration to the North; Said

Group project presentation on postcolonial theory

Mar 15

Season of Migration to the North; Said

Mar 18

Wide Sargasso Sea

Short paper #5

Mar 20

Wide Sargasso Sea; Spivak

Group project presentation on feminism

 

Mar 22

Wide Sargasso Sea; Spivak


Mar 25

No class (Spring break)

Mar 27

No class (Spring break)

Mar 29

No class (Spring break)

Apr 1

How Late it Was, How Late

Short paper #6

Apr 3

How Late it Was, How Late

Apr 5

How Late it Was, How Late

Apr 8

How Late it Was, How Late; Booker Prize readings

Apr 10

How Late it Was, How Late; Booker Prize readings

Group project presentation on the Booker Prize

Apr 12

How Late it Was, How Late; Booker Prize readings

Final paper proposal due

Apr 15

Offshore

Short paper #7

Apr 17

Offshore

Apr 19

Offshore

Apr 22

Remains of the Day

Short paper #8

Apr 24

Remains of the Day Final paper due (first draft)

Apr 26

Remains of the Day

Apr 29

The Satanic Verses

Short paper #9

May 1

The Satanic Verses

May 3

The Satanic Verses

Group project presentation on the “Rushdie Affair”

May 6

The Satanic Verses; Bhabha

May 8

The Satanic Verses; Bhabha

May 10

The Satanic Verses; Bhabha

?

Final papers due

Final papers due

SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY

Fiction

Criticism