Spring 2001

Anne Trubek

Rhetoric and Composition 481/English 399 TTh 11:00-12:15
King 235

King 139c, (440) 775-8615,
Office Hours: M, 11:00-12:00,
Tu, 3:00-4:30, & by appt

E-mail: Anne.trubek@oberlin.edu

TEACHING AND TUTORING WRITING ACROSS THE DISCIPLINES

 

Course Objectives
 
--To train you to be an effective writing tutor
--To give you practice responding to student writing
--To introduce you to the fields of composition studies and writing pedagogy

Course Procedures

The first half of the course mainly addresses the "nuts and bolts" of tutoring; the second half of the course surveys major theoretical, cultural and political issues current in the field of Rhetoric and Composition studies. Of course, one can't really separate practice from theory, so throughout the course we will consider the assumptions behind our practices as well as the practical implications of our theories.

Each week will be both discuss and practice aspects of tutoring, teaching and writing. On Tuesdays, we will discuss assigned readings. On Thursdays, the first 20 minutes or so of class will be set aside for discussions of recent tutoring experience and that week's posts to courseinfo (see below). In the first half of the semester, the remainder of Thursday classes will consist of workshops, during which we will either respond to student writing or practice our own writing. In the second half the semester, groups of you will lead the class on Thursdays.

Course Requirements

--Tutoring. You must either tutor for at least 6 hours a week at the Peer Tutoring Center or assist a writing intensive course.

--Class Participation. Obviously, a must in a small course about tutoring. No more than two absences without just cause, please.

--Weekly Participation in Courseinfo Discussion Board. We will use a course management program to hold electronic discussions. Courseinfo can be found at http://cinfo.oberlin.edu. To get to our discussion, logon, click on the "Communications" button, go to "Discussion Board" and then either add a new thread or reply to an existing thread. Posts should be written in a form appropriate to electronic communication (more informal than formal, easy to digest while reading on-screen, and not overly long). You should think of this as an "electronic journal" recording your responses to recent readings and/or tutoring experiences.

Ideally, you will post and reply whenever you have something to say, and there will be several discussion threads going at once. You are certainly welcome to post or reply more than once a week. But to try to get to that ideal communication situation, and to encourage dialogue, I'll start with this minimum requirement: each week you must either add a new thread or reply to a thread initiated by someone else. New threads must be posted by 8:00 am Tuesday; replies are due by 8:00 am Thursday. Again, you are invited to post and reply as often as you'd like. We may integrate these posts into class discussion using the laptops in the classroom.

--Reflective Essay. For this essay, you will be asked to go through all the stages of the writing process. You will pre-write, bring a first draft to the writing center, meet with me one-on-one to discuss your draft and complete a major revision of the essay.

The essay will be reflective, considering your own experience as a tutor or a student writer in light of the readings from the first weeks of the course. You might, for instance, reflect upon your writing process, experiences having your writing evaluated, or first tutoring experiences. About 5 pages. First Draft due March 3 (posted to courseinfo); Final Draft due March 9.

--Group Presentation. These presentations should help you with many skills needed to be an effective tutor: you will collaboratively write an essay, and plan and lead a class session. Each group must write an essay of 3-4 pages that responds and builds upon the readings for that week. The paper is due by 5:00 Wednesday (posted to courseinfo) enough time for everyone to read it before Thursday's class. Your group will lead that Thursday's class.

Neither the paper nor the class needs to follow any certain format; you might approach the paper as a fairly straightforward summary followed by analysis, ending with questions for the class to consider, or you might experiment with form, voice, level of discourse, etc. The class could be a straightforward discussion of readings, it could follow the workshop model of the first half of the semester (i.e. looking at student essays in light of issues brought up in readings), or you could develop any other pedagogy you think appropriate to the topic.

--Project to Improve Peer Tutoring Program. The peer tutoring program belongs to you all, of course, and this requirement asks you to develop something that you think will improve the program. Examples of such projects can be found in Podis and Podis' Working With Student Writers. Other examples include the "Writing Across the Curriculum" binder in the Writing Center, and the Peer OWL (Online Writing Lab) (see http://www.oberlin.edu/~exposwrt/owl). Projects need not be material resources; you might also choose to write an essay of at least 10 pages that addresses an area of rhetoric and composition, incorporating course readings. The essay should suggest how this topic is relevant to Oberlin's program (examples of such essays include an paper proposing Oberlin require all first-years to take a writing course or many of the essays in Working with Student Writers). Due April 26 (enough time for the projects to be used during the semester; extensions are possible for those doing essays).

--Final Report/Response on Tutoring Experience. An informal essay -- you might approach it as an extra-long discussion board post -- that reflects upon and summarizes your experiences tutoring over the course of the semester. About 4 pages. Due May 10.

Break-down of grades:
 
In-Class and Courseinfo participation 25%
Group Presentation 20%
Project 30%
Two short essays 25%

Course Materials

All of these books can be found in the Co-Op Bookstore (under EXWR 481):
Podis and Podis, Working with Student Writers (WSW)
Villanueva, Cross-Talk in Comp Theory (CT)
Berlin, Rhetoric and Reality: Writing Instruction in American Colleges, 1900-1985.

In addition, there is a reader that can be purchased from me or from Janet Pollard, Administrative Assistant, Rhetoric and Composition Program. (R)

 

SYLLABUS

PART 1: THE PRACTICE OF COMPOSITION

Week 1: Introduction

Feb. 6
Introduction to Course
Feb. 8
Gilmartin, "Working at the Drop-In Center" (WSW)
Turk, "On Working with a Class" (WSW)
Podis, "Training Peer Tutors for the Writing Lab" (WSW)
Dyehouse, "Peer Tutors and Institutional Authority" (WSW)

Week 2: Peer Tutoring

Feb. 13
Sommers, "Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers" (CT)
Harris, "Talking in the Middle: Why Writers Need Writing Tutors" (R)
Hobson, "Writing Center Pedagogy" (R)
Feb. 15
Workshop: Mock Tutoring

Week 3: Responding To Writing

Feb. 21
Brannon and Knoblauch, "On Students' Rights to Their Own Texts" (R)
Sommers, "Responding to Student Writing" (R)
Connors and Lunsford, "Teachers' Rhetorical Comments on Student Papers" (R)
Ede and Lunsford, "Audience Addressed/Audience Invoked" (CT)
Feb. 23
Workshop: Commenting on Student Essays

Week 4: The Writing Process

Feb. 28
Sommers, "Between the Drafts" (R)
Tobin, "Process Pedagogy" (R)
Murray, "Teach Writing As A Process, Not a Product" (CT)
Berlin, "Contemporary Composition: The Major Pedagogical Theories" (CT)
March 2
Workshop: Pre-Writing And Drafting
March 3
Draft, Reflective Essay due

Week 5: Rhetorical Analysis and Writing Across the Curriculum

March 7
Covino, "Rhetorical Pedagogy" (R)
McLeod, "The Pedagogy of Writing Across the Curriculum" (R)
McCormick, "On a topic of your own choosingÉ" (R)
March 9
Workshop: Rhetorical Analysis of Student Essays
Revisions due

Week 6: Error, Grammar and Style

March 14
Hartwell, "Grammar, Grammars and the Teaching of Grammar"
Bartholomae, "The Study of Error" (R)
Ohmann, "Use Definite, Specific, Concrete Language" (R)
March 16
Workshop: Editing student essays

Week 7: ESL, Bilingual and Learning Disabled Students

March 21
Zamel, "Strangers in Academia" (R)
Raimes, "Anguish as a Second Language?" (R)
Wewers, "Writing Tutors and Dyslexic Tutors" (WSW)
March 23
Mid-Term Evaluations and Reflections

SPRING BREAK

PART II: THEORIZING COMPOSITION

Week 8: Historicizing Composition

April 3
Berlin, Rhetoric and Reality
Chang, "Contextualizing the Debate" (WSW)
April 5
Group Presentation

Week 9 What Is Academic Discourse?

April 10
Bartholomae, "Inventing the University" (CT)
Bartholomae, "Working With Teachers: A Conversation with Peter Elbow" (CT)
Elbow, "Being a Writer vs. Being an Academic" (CT)
Bartholomae and Elbow, "Interchanges" (CT)
April 12
Group Presentation

Week 10 Critical Pedagogy and Questions of Access

April 17
George, "Critical Pedagogy" (R)
Delpit, "The Silenced Dialogue" (CT)
Villanueva, "Considerations for American Freireistas" (CT)
April 19
Group Presentation

Week 11 Contact Zones

April 24
Pratt, "Arts of the Contact Zone" (R)
Bizzell, "Contact Zones and English Studies" (CT)
Miller, "Fault Lines in the Contact Zone" (R)
April 26
Group Presentation
Projects Due

Week 12 Social Constructionism and Postmodernism

May 1
Bruffee, "Collaborative Learning and the 'Conversation of Mankind" (CT)
Trimbur, "Consensus and Difference in Collaborative Learning" (CT)
Faigley, "In the Turbulence of Theory" (R)
May 3
Group Presentation

Week 13 Electronic Rhetoric

May 8
Sirc, "What Is CompositionÉ? After Duchamp (Notes Toward a General Teleintertext" (R)
Vitanza, "Three Countertheses: Or, a Critical In(ter)vention into Composition Theories and Pedagogies" (R)
May 10
Conclusion and Evaluations
Final Reflective Essays Due