|
The records of the Grand Army of the Republic (GAR), Henry Lincoln Post #364 document its 50-year history as an organization that supported Civil War veterans in Oberlin. The series contained herein describe the operations of the group, events and meetings held, income and expenses, and the passing of its members. The collection spans many years and many functions of the group.
The collection is divided into six record series: I. Bylaws and Regulations; II. Journals; III. Membership; IV. Financial Records; V. Historical Records; and VI. Clippings. Within each series, files are arranged either chronologically or alphabetically.
The first series in the collection holds three copies of the bylaws approved by the Ohio GAR headquarters in September of 1883, documenting the establishment of the Oberlin GAR post. Two copies are identical published leaflets, and the final copy is handwritten in a bound journal.
The journals (Series II) contain minutes of meetings of the Henry Lincoln Post of the GAR, and provide a consecutive record of the actions of the group from 1883 to 1931. From this part of the collection, the researcher is able to get a very real sense of the day to day actions of the Post.
The membership series, along with the member lists contained in the journals, is extremely valuable, as it possesses many individual member histories, and could possibly be used for genealogical research. The papers contained in these folders give information on what becoming a member of the organization entailed, and the extent of the sense of fraternity within the post.
Central to the financial series is the set of five ledgers, which give a comprehensive account of the expenditures and income of the Post. Also important are the thorough Quartermaster’s reports. Lastly, the historical records and clippings series contain a wealth of information about how the Henry Lincoln Post and its members influenced the Oberlin community, through planned events and the lives of individuals.
Note: In the fall of 2006, Oberlin student Nick Gliserman did extensive research on this collection. He found that there were discrepancies within the records, especially concerning individual member histories. The researcher should be aware that these inconsistencies exist.
|