|
The Raymond Herbert Stetson Papers consist almost entirely of original
letters that Dr. Stetson wrote to friends and colleagues. In no
small way this personal papers group was constructed by former Oberlin
College Archivist William E. Bigglestone. In an effort to preserve
the work of the late Professor Stetson, Bigglestone, with some assistance
of Stetson family members and Frederick B. Artz, solicited letters
sent by Stetson to his friends (e.g. Robert Kimball Richardson [1876-1952]
and James M. Snodgrass [b.1908, A.B. 1931]), and over a period of
years this collection was assembled. Given the way in which the
collection was assembled, however, gaps in the record doubtless
exist. Some persons, for example, were unprepared to release documents
and others considered his letters too sensitive to be added to the
collection at the time of the solicitation because some persons
reported on were still alive.
The content of the letters is overwhelmingly related to Stetson's
research in the areas of speech and motor phonetics. The largest
number of the letters center on his laboratory experiments and his
subsequent writing on them. Letters to his peers in the Psychology
field are the most detailed and useful in terms of understanding
the techniques used in the experiments. Of special interest are
Stetson's letters to former students and colleagues James Snodgrass,
Clarence Hudgins (b.1897) and Alfred Hubbard (b.1907) the correspondence
of which represents the bulk of the collection. The letters to Arthur
Slater-Hammel (unknown), James Pickett (b.1921, A.B. 1943) and Roger
Sperry though smaller in quantity, are also quite rich in reporting
on Stetson's activities.
The two areas that Stetson wrote about outside of his work concerned
governance of the college and his service on various faculty committees.
Stetson's involvement in the administration of Oberlin is in particular
outlined in his correspondence to several people, including Snodgrass,
Hudgins, and Hubbard, but also in letters to associates outside
of Psychology like Robert Richardson. The letters openly report
on Stetson's feelings and convictions in terms of the people and
situations that he encountered. For example, Stetson openly and
intensely disliked former Oberlin College President, Ernest Hatch
Wilkins (1880-1966).
The subject matter that reveals the most about the personality,
beliefs, and inner workings of R.H. Stetson, in addition to his
judgmental remarks about the Oberlin administration, is his analysis
of, and positions on, the Second World War. Many of Stetson's letters,
from the period of 1938-45, deal with his views on the war, and
from his discussion one may establish some sense of Stetson's beliefs
and prejudices about the world in general. For example, Stetson
freely writes on the reasons for the war in Europe; including his
views on Jews and their role in the conflict, and, perhaps even
betrays a prejudice in regard to the Japanese when discussing the
Pacific conflict. The aforementioned topics are covered in almost
all of Stetson's letters written to his close friends during the
period of 1941-45, as well as references to Jews in his letters
to Artz in 1947 and 1949.
Unfortunately, the correspondence offers little evidence to document
Stetson's personal life, although the contents of the folder entitled
"Letters/Notes on the Broad Interests of R.H. Stetson,"
are somewhat insightful in this regard. The 49 letters to Frederick
Artz, written in 1947 and 1949 when Artz was away in France and
visiting his (Artz's) parents in Dayton, Ohio, reveal little about
their relationship (they shared a residence for 26 years), although
it is known that they shared a passion for the local Cosmos club
(note Walter Horton's letter to Artz re. the death of Stetson).
Additionally, the manner in which Stetson composed many of his letters
is to be noted. Stetson, for the sake of speed and space, characteristically
abbreviated nearly every word of a letter over five characters in
length, normally deleting most of the vowels. One is still able
to ascertain the content in his letters, but this unusual style
makes the task a bit more arduous for most researchers.
Aside from the correspondence, this collection also contains a
number of Stetson's publications, as well as the publications of
a few of his peers and students. These publications are useful when
trying to place the research reported in his letters into an overall
context. A volume of papers by a number of Stetson's former students
appeared as a supplement to the American Journal of Psychology,
in 1939 as a tribute to the retiring Stetson. These papers illustrate
the various directions that Stetson's students took in their own
research, and affirm the way in which Stetson's work served as a
building block for their work in the field.
|